9 thoughts on “Do you like these guys?

  1. Yeah . . . they are cute . . . not as cute as the ‘Brad Pitt’ lookalike the other day. [He was awesome btw . . . !]

    Love to see more of him and these guys in future . . . with and without speedos!

  2. The definition of “Speedo” seems to be broadening all the time. These fashion fag “speedos” don’t do anything for me. Nor does anything else that gets away from the classic, 3-inch side, athletic-cut Speedo in solid colors. The basic Aussiebum suits excepted.

  3. Hey Randy, using the word “fag” seems to define where you’re coming from. Who is the fag here anyhow. And your idea of a classic speedo is way out of date. Maybe time to get with it. It’s the year 2014 not 1980.

  4. Yeah . . . I think 3-inch sides are FAR too wide! A great speedo is a narrow sided one . . . perhaps 1 or 1.5 inches AT MOST!

    For comfort in wear as well as a good appearance/profile, a narrow side combined with a high cut is best (IMHO) . . .

    I know there’ll be some disagreement amongst others – that’s just my personal preference (as well as what I buy) in a speedo!

  5. Sam,

    The feedback I’ve been getting (with the next run of my DE Swimwear in mind) is that you guys like a smaller side which I thought was interesting.

    Thanks a bunch for all your comments guys – I love it!!!

    Dave

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *